Iranian LPG reaches China, UANI says
A tanker-tracking group reports shipments despite the U.S. blockade. Official records and earlier independent reporting show the limits of that claim.

Iranian liquefied petroleum gas has reached China through waters off Malaysia despite the U.S. blockade, according to United Against Nuclear Iran, an advocacy group that monitors shipping. A 2 November Newsmax report, citing Fox News and UANI, described the tanker SOGL carrying a cargo loaded in late August. The report concerns an earlier voyage, not a newly observed departure today. [1]
Whether a ship passed the blockade and whether it evaded enforcement are separate questions. In an independently reported 16 October Reuters article, a U.S. military official said passage alone did not establish evasion: vessels were assessed individually, and sanctions status was not the sole criterion for interception. [2]
There is an official record linking SOGL to Iranian petroleum shipments. In its 8 October sanctions announcement, the U.S. Treasury identified the vessel by IMO number 9208227 and designated its owner, Gravion Maritime Company. Treasury alleged that SOGL had carried more than two million barrels of Iranian propane and butane since September 2025. That record does not independently verify the later China delivery described by UANI. [3]
UANI’s own September tracker, published on 7 October, provides a further timing distinction. It counts exports when vessels cross the declared blockade line, rather than when they load at an Iranian port. A loading date therefore cannot by itself establish when a cargo passed the blockade. [4]
Reuters also obtained accounts from four maritime-security sources about Iranian cargoes being concealed among transfers off Oman. Separately, it reported Kpler data showing no Iranian crude exports in September. LPG shipments and crude exports are different measures; evidence of some product cargoes getting through does not establish that the wider crude trade had resumed. [2]
The reviewed reporting supports scrutiny of particular shipments, with a significant qualification: EWN has not independently examined the tracking data, satellite imagery or original voyage footage. The precise scale of current flows remains unverified here. The sanctions record, shipment allegations and U.S. response answer different parts of the story. [1–4]
Photo credits
Niels Johannes / Wikimedia Commons · CC BY-SA 4.0 (photo and adapted social artwork). Website resized; social AI-enhanced with text. EWN trademark rights excluded. No endorsement. · Archive photograph: Thetagas passing Vlaardingen near Rotterdam, Netherlands, on 4 April 2015. This is an unrelated LPG carrier, not SOGL or any vessel named in this report. · Licence
Sources & context · 4
- Newsmax · Brian Freeman, 2 November 2026
Reports UANI’s account through Fox News. These are the same originating shipment allegations, rather than independent corroboration. The SOGL account concerns an earlier voyage.
- Reuters · Feras Dalatey and Jonathan Saul, via MarketScreener
Independent maritime-security interviews, U.S. military response and Kpler context. Its UANI-sourced counts are not a second independent verification of the newer claim.
- U.S. Treasury · 8 October 2026 sanctions announcement
Primary official designation and vessel identity record; transport allegations remain Treasury claims, not independent proof of a later delivery.
- UANI · September 2026 Tanker Tracker, published 7 October
Original advocacy-group monitoring methodology. Same originating organization as the lead; not an additional independent source for the China voyage.